From Rigid Policies to Flexible Approaches: The Transformative Impact of Soft HRM

Traditional personnel management is usually characterized by formal structure and rules of behavior. Such management emphasizes strict adherence to rules and procedures standardized by administrative processes, compliance, and control. These practices of personnel management can stifle creativity, obstruct employee autonomy, and foster employee apathy (Schein, 2006). As times change, so does the role of personnel management in the present socio-economic situation. In the face of increasing competition everywhere, the limitations of these normal practices have become more apparent. This has key implications for re-evaluating HRM strategies. An Operational function transformed itself into Human Resources and has gradually become an ally of strategic importance (Schultz, 2021). Basic concepts of management such as strategy, organization, people, and culture will clearly define the new era of Soft HRM.

In contrast to traditional personnel management, the Soft HRM approach emerged as a contemporary alternative to prioritize flexibility, emotional intelligence, and the well-being of employees by nurturing a supportive and empathetic work environment which will be able to improve employee satisfaction and engagement (Huselid, 1995). Soft HRM shifts focus from strict adherence to rules and procedures standardized by administrative processes, compliance, and control to more adaptable and flexible strategies which will be able to create a work environment that not only retains talent but also drives innovation and productivity by emphasizing the individual needs of employees, promoting collaboration, open communication, and professional development (Alam & Mukherjee, 2014).

This paper specifically seeks to emphasize how Soft HRM practices can ensure businesses have an effective workforce in place to meet operational needs with the help of Soft HRM characteristics such as flexibility and empathetic supervision leading to higher retention rates, employee engagement, and overall organizational performance than typical rigid personnel management policies. Instead, this approach considers employees not just numbers, but people who participate and contribute to the company's success. In other words, the family-like approach enhances qualitative results and operational efficiency.

The Limitations of Rigid HRM Policies

The rigid HRM has been associated with the Michigan model, which is the most attached to the business goals and objectives of an organization (International Social Security Association, 2022). It focuses on using hard human resource practices to 'drive' the execution of strategic objectives within organizations themselves. Unlike Soft HRM which occupies a human-centric approach, the emphasis of the hard approach is very much on the resource as a means of maximizing shareholder value over the short term. In this kind of working environment, a manager's primary role is to make money for owners and other stuff like concerns about employee rights are a distraction, Thereby, organizations aim to maximize returns that will serve themselves most efficiently which serves everybody eventually (Collings & Wood, 2009).

Rigid HRM policies refer to the aspects of HR functions within an organization that are fixed and do not change or make allowance for employee discretion. These policies also emphasize compliance over employee flexibility and discretion. Some policies include:

• Strict Performance Metrics: Rigidly defined KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) that do not allow much from the employees or the conditions of the circumstances to have an impact on the development (Boxall, 2008).

• Hierarchical Structures: A pyramidal approach to management that is centered at the top and does not encourage sharing ideas and working together thus blocking communicative channels and innovation (Boxall, 2008).

That archaic kind of thinking leads to disengaged employees, high turnover, and no innovation outputs. This might be what contributes to feelings by employees of being undervalued, which in turn again circularly relates to lower job satisfaction (Gallup, 2021). According to a Gallup report (2024), only 23% of workers around the world feel engaged at work. The strict policy will further discourage innovation from taking place because the culture of fear and compliance oozing from it dampens an individual's ability for innovative thought or problem-solving. Because of this, organizations need to decide how they can create flexible and attractive workspaces that reduce negative outcomes (Amabile & Khaire, 2008). Malik, et al. (2020) found that employee-centric HRM practices that increase employee motivation, employee engagement, and positive work attitude can reduce the rate of employee turnover and disengagement and will aid businesses in achieving their objectives through the retention of the skilled and motivated workforce (Malik, et al., 2020).

The Transformative Impact of Soft HRM

While the practices of Soft HRM emphasize the improvement of business performance, employee retention, and employee engagement, it still faces some obstacles. The primary one is that it may be implemented differently depending on a certain department or team. It could result in conflict and a healthy working environment and may hamper the trust in HR practices. For example, it is estimated that providing excellent support and development to one department would contribute to improving employee motivation and involvement towards the success of the company; this may also work at the disadvantage of the other departments as this could result in discrimination in treatment and dissatisfaction and disengagement of employees (Mansaray, 2019). Another primary criticism is that employee-oriented might backfire and foster a lack of accountability and unproductive efficiency due to the satisfaction of employees with the productivity of the business (Guest,2017).

These above-mentioned key criticisms of Soft HRM practices can be avoided by effective strategic HRM practices. The inconsistencies of Soft HRM can be addressed by incorporating real-time feedback or performance metrics that would ensure a balance between the employees’ needs and the organizational requirements. For instance, the Salesforce approach can be incorporated by the firms and AI CRM to improve the employee experience by building tools for working together efficiently and quickly, while also putting the onus on the employees to overcome their own productivity and connectivity issues (Salesforce, 2024).

For the other primary issue, Businesses can tackle their objectives without clashing with over-emphasized employee well-being by integrating performance metrics that reflect employee experience and business productivity (Aguinis & Kraiger, 2008). For example, Google employees were able to create great products like Gmail, AdSense, and Google News, due to the OKR concept and Google Geist which includes Soft HRM elements. These strategies are adopted by the organization to create a great environment for the workforce to be creative and engaged and optimize their performance which ultimately increases the productivity of the organization (Akram, 2024).

Conclusion

In conclusion, Soft HRM is gaining immense attention from businesses as it addresses the pressing issues of employee needs and organizational requirements over the traditional rigid policies. However, it is difficult to escape criticisms such as inconsistent application and complacency risk. Therefore, organizations can make use of strategic Soft HRM policies in order to overcome such serious problems through the implementation of strategic HR practices in real-time, with feedback and performance metrics. These flexible HRM practices give a mirror-changing view to the workforce, which develops into valued contributors, retaining talent to help drive organizations toward success.

References

Aguinis, H. & Kraiger, K., 2008. Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, pp. 451-474.

Malik, E., Baig, S. . A. & Manzoor, U., 2020. Effect of HR Practices on Employee Retention: The Role of Perceived Supervisor Support. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, Volume 3, pp. 1-7.

Akram, U., 2024. Case Study: How Google Boosts its Employees’ Engagement. [Online]
Available at: https://6q.io/blog/google-boosts-employees-engagement/
[Accessed 22 October 2024].

Alam, A. & Mukherjee, U., 2014. HRM- A Literature Survey. IOSR Journal of Business and Management , Volume 16, pp. 31-38.

Amabile , T. M. & Khaire, M., 2008. Creativity and the Role of the Leader. [Online]
Available at: https://hbr.org/2008/10/creativity-and-the-role-of-the-leader
[Accessed 18 October 2024].

Boxall, P. &. P. J., 2008. Strategy and Human Resource Management. 2 ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brian, B. . E. .. & Huselid, . M. . A. .., 1998. High Performance Work System and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 16, pp. 53-101.

Collings, D. G. & Wood, . G., 2009. Section 1 The context of HRM. In: Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach. s.l.:Routledge, pp. 1-15.

Gallup, 2021. State of the Global Workplace, s.l.: Gallup.

Gallup, 2024. From Suffering to Thriving. [Online]
Available at: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
[Accessed 18 October 2024].

Guest, D. E., 2017. Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. School of Management and Business Journal, Volume 27, p. 22–38.

Huselid, M. A., 1995. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Volume 38, pp. 635-872.

International Social Security Association, 2022. ISSA Guidelines:Human Resource Management in Social Security Administration. [Online]
Available at: https://www.issa.int/guidelines/hrm/238299#:~:text=The%20Michigan%20model%20often%20described,training%20and%20development%20of%20employees.
[Accessed `18 October 2024].

Mansaray, H. E., 2019. The Role of Human Resource Management in Employee. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), Volume 2, pp. 183-194.

Salesforce, 2024. Create employee experiences that drive business success. [Online]
Available at: https://www.salesforce.com/uk/solutions/by-role/salesforce-for-hr/
[Accessed 22 October 2024].

Schein, E. H., 2006. Organizational Culture and Leadershiop. 3 ed. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.

Schultz, C. M., 2021. The future and the role of human resource management in South Africa during the Fourth Industrial Revolution. [Online]
Available at: https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/1624/2777
[Accessed 17 October 2024].

Taiwo, A. S., 2010. The influence of work environment on workers productivity: A case of selected oil and gas industry in Lagos, Nigeria. African Journal on Business Management, Volume 4, p. 299²307.